UNIVERSAL LIFE INSURANCE SCAM
Universal Life is designed as a
Cash value is built by investing
overpayments with the carrier
Illustrations are now capped at 7%
If you are, you are certainly not alone.
A good part of my early career at a major life insurance carrier was spent trying to help "rescue" Universal life policyholders who had been misled by agents who were either unscrupulous or just plain stupid.
These people certainly had reason to believe Universal life insurance is a scam.
That being said, when sold and disclosed correctly, Universal life insurance or UL is not a scam. In fact, it can be a handy financial tool.
The purpose of this article is to give you an understanding of current UL offerings, how they work, and how they came into being. If you already know the basics, or just want to skip around the article, you can use the quick navigation tool above.
The fastest growing product in the life insurance industry, universal life insurance is a policy hybrid that takes on some of the characteristics of both term insurance and whole life insurance.
The range of UL choices varries between policies designed as low volatility, cash value savings vehicles to policies that guarantee coverage for life at a more economical premium cost than traditional whole life.
The type of universal life insurance you choose dictates its primary traits.
For instance, Indexed universal life( IUL) -the current "hot" product- operates differently than guaranteed universal life (GUL). These differences are discussed in detail below.
Differences, significant as they are, the common thread is that implemented correctly and paid for, universal life insurance is , with rare exception, a permanent product.
The most common universal life options are Current Assumption, Indexed and Guaranteed.
Current assumption UL- This policy, when designed and sold correctly-more on that later, is meant to build cash values with interest credited to the savings component of the plan.
The savings component is a return of the portion of premium not allocated to insurance cost or administrative fees. The interest credited is based on the general fund performance of the insurer.
In simplified terms -you overpay for the privilege of having the over-payment share in the investment returns of the carrier. If the insurance company's returns are not above the policy floor (usually 2-2.5 %) the policy is credited with the floor rate.
These policies can be powerful tools if designed correctly and sold with clear communication.
However, precise communication has not always been the case. Significant lawsuits arose in the mid 90’s over policies that were sold in the 1980’s.
The complaint was that the policies were sold anticipating unsustainably high-interest rates and not designed to maximize return. The result being that when rates began to fall, increasing mortality costs ate away the cash value and many of the policies “imploded” and lapsed.
So after paying for years on policies that were sold as “permanent” customers were left with no insurance.
This was not a good look for insurance carriers. and reforms were undertaken. Illustration software started capping the interest rate (this is product specific, but 7% is the most common max ) that could be “sold” as reasonable to assume.
Further, a midpoint column between the guaranteed column and the more rosy sales prediction became prevalent.
In addition to being well over-optimistic about the future of interest rates, the sales forces were equally shady when it came to explaining the premium payment structure.
Universal life policies are issued with multiple premium choices.
The first of these is a minimum payment (this is used in the calculation of limited guarantees).
There is a target payment (this is the premium that the sales force has commissions calculated on)
Lastly, you should be given a max non-Modified Endowment Contract or MEC) payment from your advisor. If the goal of this policy is to gain cash value, as it should be, the max non-mec payment is the right choice.
However, because interest rates were calculated at so high a rate, agents often advised making minimum payments, assuming that the interest credited would keep the policy healthy.
History shows us that it didn’t happen that way and the reforms have taken much of the sizzle out of current assumption UL. The steak remains a solid meal, just no hype.
Most major carriers still sell current assumption UL, (with large font disclaimers).The policy remains a mighty financial tool, just not the miracle it never really was.
Key Take Aways
When the sizzle came off of traditional current assumption life, carriers raced to find the next “hot” product to sell. As it has turned out (after nearly 20 years), they were on to something.
Indexed universal life operates under much the same rules as current assumption with the except for how the policy cash value is credited.
Universal life policies are credited in correlation with the positive returns of the equities index chosen by the policy owner from the options available.
the floor remains, so there are no “negative” gains. The carriers achieve this by putting caps on the possible return as well as the “participation rate”.
Naturally, this means that if a policy is tied to the S&P and the index gains 25% in a year, the plan will only credit to the cap (usually 12-14%).
Many policy owners will take this trade-off in exchange for no losses.
If you are wondering how policies are credited with a floor in terrible stock market years (think 2009), the answer is that the carriers keep the vast majority of the general fund in bonds and buy options up to the policy caps. They sell call options over the caps (the carrier doesn’t keep the difference in good years).
The result of this innovation has been a stable product that has returned 1.5-2% better than current assumption UL.
However, weary of overinflated stock return projections the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) passed regulation limiting projections to 7% with a midpoint and the guarantee.
Additionally, NAIC regulations dictate that the loan rate cannot be illustrated at more than 1% less than the crediting rate. The reason for this is to limit policy loan arbitrage illustrations.
Not surprisingly, the crediting index option, floors, caps, and participation rates of Indexed Universal Life policies vary significantly from carrier to carrier.
If you have a specific index you would like to be used as the crediting vehicle, make sure your Agent knows this. An independent Agent with access to multiple carriers will likely be able to either provide a carrier who offers the specific index.
Just as important, an experienced Agent will be able to show why the choice of index may be less critical than other policy features such as caps & loan rates.
Unlike current assumption UL or indexed UL, GUL is not designed to build significant cash value. Nor has it been subject to the "universal life insurance is a scam" theme.
Instead, GUL is a means to provide the most economical option for permanent insurance.
While more costly than the 20 and 30-year term policy's you commonly see, these policies don’t expire as long as the premium is paid. This premium is less costly than a traditional whole life plan or either of the UL plans discussed earlier.
A GUL is often referred to as a hybrid policy in that it provides the benefit of a term policy at a lower cost than either permanent policies or annual renewable term policies.
A GUL is often the right decision for people who want permanent insurance without an attached savings vehicle. The negative of a GUL in relationship to a policy that builds cash value more aggressively is that you do not have the payment flexibility that a cash value policy affords
Key Take Aways
You might not know that different insurance companies will also treat each case differently. That is your story matters and is an important component to underwriting classification.
For example, Prudential Financial may have more of an appetite for a particular type of risk that SBLI does. In such a case the underwriting grade will reflect this increased appetite.
So, if your Agent only represented one carrier and you found out later that you could have gotten a rate 19% or 39% better, how would you feel?
You’d probably be angry either at the agent or yourself, likely both. So it’s essential that your Agent represent multiple carriers.
Most good independent agents will have access to over 50 carriers. This ensures the best chance at the best rate.
Note that if he doesn’t have access to alternatives, he may not be interested in telling you.
Key Take Aways
So, I have been spilling digital ink about the importance of using an independent Agent, and you may think that sounds a bit self-serving coming from an independent agent.
When you're right, you're right. ..But I have the proof!
Fairly well controlled High Cholesterol
HDL/LDL ratio of 4.9 & total cholesterol 287
Statin use (crestor) - No Other Health Concerns
This looks like a standard/preferred case that might get a better rating with one or two carriers.... depending on the insurer's appetite for a cholesterol risk. Let’s take a look at the rates.
Please see the case study below. It will show why it is in your interest to have as many options as possible available when shopping for life insurance, especially if you suffer a health impairment
Gender: Female Age: 50
$200000 GUL Guaranteed to age 121
Preferred Best Rates - Preferred Rates - Standard Rates
|CARRIER||annual PYMT||CARRIER||Annual PYMT||CARRIER||Annual PYMT|
This table which shows only a few of the major life insurance companies available illustrates the difference in rates. For Preferred Plus rates Banner is 32.7% more expensive than AIG
On its face, this seems like a pretty straight-forward choice and if underwriting grades between carriers are the same, it really can be that simple.
This kind of natural price shopping is particularly helpful for younger folks in good health and shows why you want to use an independent Agent.
For people who suffer from High Cholesterol or any other health diagnosis, it gets much more complicated.
Now that you know that the answer to the question "is universal life insurance a scam", and the information you will need to receive the best deal on a universal life policy, it’s time to gather the information and speak to an independent Agent (raising my hand).
Because life insurers manage their appetite for specific risks by being more lenient or more stringent with underwriting grades, you need to know which company will grade you a preferred plus risk and which ones will grade you as standard.
Simply give us a call or shoot an email over and we can get you started.
We are committed to totally transparent pricing (we’ll even share our computer screen with you if you’d like), and making the application process as painless as possible.
If you have any questions, We’d like to know.
Jim Tobin is the owner of Life Insurance Help Desk, a Fairfield County, CT. life insurance agency. You can find him on Google + and Facebook. Over the past 10 years, Jim has used his CFP-financial planning designation to help individuals with their life insurance needs. In addition to working with life insurance clients, Jim teaches ESL classes in his spare time. He resides with his beautiful wife Nicole and the 3 cats that rule their lives..
Affordable Life Insurance with Migraines
Affordable Life Insurance With Ativan Use – Get The Best Deal
Affordable Life Insurance for New Mexico Residents – Get The Best Deal
Affordable Life Insurance for Texas Residents – Get The Best Deal
Affordable Life Insurance for Virginia Residents – Get The Best Deal
Affordable Life Insurance for Michigan Residents – Get The Best Deal
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new window. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.